Can Rock and Roll Save Your Life?

December 20th, 2010

(Originally appeared here. Check out http://www.we-support-local-music.com for other great local bloggers.)

“Rock and Roll Will Save Your Life”, by Steve Almond, may not be the funniest book I’ve ever read about being a music fan, but it’s close. In this entertaining memoir, Mr. Almond takes us on a tour of his adult life viewed through the lens of Drooling Fanaticism, his term for the pure, hopeless note-crush that the musically talentless have on the musically talented. I’m pleased to say that I laughed out loud several times, and subjected my wife, She Who Must Be Taunted, to the oral presentation of multiple passages, even though she is almost certain to read the book herself and I, regrettably, am a terrible out-loud reader, with the rhythm of a stalled subway car and the timing of an asthmatic whale.

Alas, although this essay begins as a review, it is about to veer off into navel-gazing, since you can easily obtain this book at your local bookstore or Kindletorium, but far less easily gaze into my navel. See, Steve’s experience is a pure one, and mine is not. I could have been him – it would have been easy. And the extent to which I disagree with him – insofar as he has any thesis at all in his book – is the extent to which I failed to be him, for which I am exceedingly grateful.

I recently wrote, in my newsletter, that my desire to be a rock’n’roll star came to me late at night, during a portentous midnight conversation in the dark, as I camped out on the floor of a friend’s bedroom. It really was that sudden, and it wasn’t any more realistic than the hero worship of Mr. Almond’s Drooling Fanatic. I don’t think I was in love, at the time, with anything different than the average music fan: the desperate need for life to mean something more than it actually does, the quest to tease some sort of operatic significance out of the pedestrian everypersonness of our lives: love, family, ecstacy, death. Unlike Mr. Almond’s Drooling Fanatic, I was a musician already, with a reasonable amount of talent; like the Drooling Fanatic, however, I was still on the outside looking in.

And I remained there, for a long time. I took out an ad in the Phoenix and attempted to join a band which featured a drummer with a kit larger than my bedroom, and got kicked out of that band, ostensibly, because I didn’t have a car – but I’m pretty sure it was because I was a wannabe dweeb. I met a doomed siren named Scott Mastro and miserably failed to even realize that I was a corner of a love triangle with a female musician who was almost as damaged. I presented my own derivative, sappy, overly obvious material on the stage of the Nameless Coffeehouse, to little or no effect. I failed to join a band that I had actually heard of, which was completely reconstituting itself around the original guitarist and a bass player who had “moved beyond the music into the image”. I joined, and managed to stay in, a joyful ska/pop band called Agent 13, which ultimately imploded after six years in a matter of a few hours. I hid in graduate school and wrote a ton of songs. And yet, still, I was on the outside looking in.

What finally kicked me in the ass – and this is a story I’ve probably told elsewhere – was a lunch I had with Peter Mulvey, right before he left town to become Peter Mulvey. I met Peter at a songwriting circle in Porter Square (one of the only two people I knew, on first listen, that they were going places, and I’ve been right both times), and I was fortunate enough to become an acquiantance – not quite a friend, since I was a bit too old and a bit too embarrassed about everything to meet Peter as an equal, but an acquaintance nonetheless. And on this day when we had lunch, he was telling me about his trials and tribulations in the music business and I looked at him and realized: as far as he knows – because I’d met him after my band broke up, after I’d started to hide – as far as he knows, I’m just this guy who’s always going to be bitching about not getting out of his own living room.

If Steve Almond were writing about this lunch, he’d have the good sense and talent to turn it into a whole book chapter. I don’t have that kind of space, or his patience for narration. But this was a seminal moment – when I realized that I could either be on the outside looking in, with a hero worship of the musician’s life, or I could do it. Unlike Mr. Almond, I had the choice – and almost fifteen years later, I’m almost, almost, happy with how it’s turned out.

No, I’m not a star. No, I don’t make my living at it. Yes, I’ve learned about the horror of the music business from the inside – from watching friends work their way through it, from watching the people above me on the ladder stand on that same damn rung of the ladder forever, even as the ladder grows taller and keeps trying to shake them off. I’ve been on the other side of those moments where the room is empty, and you’re playing, and that’s what you do, and maybe there’s someone in the room, one person, who sees your genius, and maybe there isn’t, but all that matters is that you get up there and do your act and eat your burger and pack your gear and go home and put your head on the pillow and think, yep, I was great tonight. Too bad nobody saw me.

Every day, a great musician falls in the forest. Sometimes there’s someone like Steve Almond to hear him; sometimes there’s not. But on this side of the Drooling Fanatic divide, the music burns differently – when it comes out of us, in a murmur or a torrent, in military rows or as a filthy rabble, it reminds us that we have the ability to be that hero to ourselves. I’ve lost count of the times that I’ve played one of my old songs and thought to myself, “Damn, I’m good at this”; and that’s less than a step away from saying “Damn, I wish I’d written that”. The enormity of knowing what it’s like to make the Drooling Fanatics among us feel that way is something we can appreciate because we’re less than a step away from being Drooling Fanatics ourselves.

Being able to do it makes less of a difference than you might think.

The Basement of My Mind

December 19th, 2010

When my wife, She Who Must Be Taunted, and I were on vacation up in Nova Scotia many years ago (if you haven’t been there, you must, must go), we encountered some remarkable collapsing architecture. It seemed that land was so cheap up there that, sometimes, when people needed a new house, they didn’t bother tearing down the old house – they’d just build another house next to it, and leave the old one there. One night, we encountered a house, surrounded by aimless cud-chewing cattle, which was deformed at a 5 or 10-degree angle, as if the TV station it was tuned to wasn’t coming in quite right (those of you who don’t remember analog TV may want to ask your parents about that one). Just sitting there, minding its own business, cluttering up the yard. Read more »

All Those Baritone Singer-Songwriters Look the Same To Me

November 21st, 2010

My wife, She Who Must Be Taunted, is a member of the Davis Square LiveJournal group, which is apparently some sort of virtual community which hovers on the boundary of “you kids get off my lawn” status, as far as I can be bothered to notice. A while back, she went to their meet-up, which is apparently a gathering where people wear their virtual nametags (“Hello, My Name Is shakeyourbooty5876”) and find out what each other looks like. This meet-up, in fine Davis Square fashion, was at the Burren. Read more »

The Center of Attention

October 31st, 2010

The oddest moment of any gig is that moment when you load the car. The audience is gone, and all the compliments have been paid and the CDs sold, and you’re there in the parking lot, or the driveway, or wherever it is that you load out, and you’re all alone. And the silence is overwhelming, and you think, “Something happened here tonight, but I’ll be damned if I know what.” Read more »

Getting Better

October 1st, 2010

Here’s a quote from Sam Bayer’s Low Notes, April 13, 2006: Read more »

Shlomo the Dreidel Shark

September 5th, 2010

So here’s the story. About two years ago, my friend Jon Waterman finished his master’s degree in the history of disaster songs, and as part of a practicum on writing disaster songs, I penned “The Wreck of the Chicken Piccata”, in which, because I’m a professional smartass and I can’t take anything seriously, nothing particular disastrous happens. Read more »

You Can’t Learn Performance In Your Living Room

August 28th, 2010

(Originally appeared here. Check out http://www.we-support-local-music.com for other great local bloggers.)

The other night, I was channel surfing – no, it’s not practicing, but my thumb does get a workout, so maybe it counts – and I happened across a half-hour Comedy Central presentation featuring a comedian named Myq Kaplan. This, frankly, astonished me, because the last time I saw Myq Kaplan in person – and I concede that this was several years ago – he was telling jokes at the Club Passim open mike, and, well, he was not, um, funny.

Now, one of the lovely, if slightly demented, things about the folk acoustic open mike scene is that, as my old pal Ken Batts liked to point out, everyone’s good – in other words, we’re too polite not to applaud. It’s like cosmic background radiation – there’s a level below which the applause never goes. That’s nice, and supportive, and welcoming, but it’s also planned. You can plan applause. You can think to yourself, “Well, I’ll give him an A for effort, even though it’s clear that he only took up the glockenspiel yesterday afternoon, perhaps on a dare”, and you’ll calibrate your applause appropriately, but it’ll still be applause.

Not funny, however, can’t hide behind a smattering of polite laughter. You can’t plan laughter. It doesn’t happen. And my primary memory of Myq Kaplan is watching him for five minutes, dying, as they say, in a room occupied mostly by his voice and the occasional cough (followed at the end, of course, by polite applause). Which is why I was kind of astonished to discover that, several years later, Myq Kaplan is a riot. His timing is splendid, his facial expressions are scrumptious, his stage persona is well-crafted, and his jokes made me laugh fairly hard.

How in the world did this happen? Well, it happened because Myq Kaplan stood on stage at Club Passim and died, among other things. There ain’t no substitute for learning in public – none. A few years ago, I wrote a song called “The Band That Never Was” – good song, no room for it in the rotation, don’t perform it much. But it pretty much captured the essence of the “hell, I could do that if I tried” school of performance:

I got blisters on my fingers from the pull tabs on the soda cans
I got carpal tunnel syndrome from waving at my imaginary fans
The pressure’s more than you can know
That’s why we’re mostly incognito
We have parts to learn and songs to write
Maybe we’ll do it tomorrow

I’ve been performing solo since 1997. And in the beginning, I’m absolutely certain I sucked. (Back then, of course, I was convinced I was a genius, but, well, you live and learn.) But I kept getting on stage, over and over, until I became the epic master of stagecraft you see before you today. And sure, it’s had a lot to do with great advice I’ve gotten along the way, but all of it – all of it – happened because it happened in public. After a while, you learn what works and what doesn’t; which rules to follow and which rules to break; when the audience is right and when you are (and yes, sometimes the audience is wrong). But you can’t learn that in your living room (unless your living room is regularly occupied by random strangers).

So the next time you’re at an open mike, or you’re at a coffeehouse and an open mike erupts around you: yes, you’ll hear the glockenspiel guy. And you may be tempted to provide nothing more than a cosmic background radiation level of applause. But for all you know, you may be listening to somebody who will turn into me, or Myq Kaplan, or Lori McKenna. So be generous.

Ah, Youth

August 12th, 2010

Hold this image in your mind for a moment: 12-year-old me, with a full head of curly hair, struggling to strike a power chord on the stage while screaming, prepubescent Jewish girls attempt to rip off my clothing. Read more »

Doing What You Set Out To Do

July 18th, 2010

I’ve been writing songs for, oh, 30 years and change. Lots has changed about my songwriting in that time – I used to write for piano, and now I write mostly for guitar; I used to write a lot more songs of maudlin yearning (like ya do); I used to worry, in my dry spells, about whether I’d ever write another song (believe it or not). But one thing remains constant: I have no idea how it works. Read more »

PROs and cons

June 20th, 2010

Today, my friends, we explore the follies of youth, overripe expectations, and the extent to which we musicians end up with the short end of our own damn stick.

Many years ago, when I was a young, impressionable musician, I joined BMI, one of the three performance rights organizations (PROs) in the United States. Hey, I was going to be a star, right? Gotta have someone to collect all those dollars from my airplay. I received my contract, which I signed forthwith, and set out to become the star I was bound to be.

Now, PROs in the United States are globally unusual, for two reasons: first, there are more than one of them, and second, they decline to collect playlists for live performances, but rather use another formula – say, airplay – to determine the distribution of live performance fees. And third – although I have no idea whether this differs in other countries – they pay their agents on commission.

Let’s consider, now, if we might, the fetid consequences of this particular arrangement of things. First, if you’re a venue, and you have music, you have to pay fees to all three PROs. Because the chances are that the artists you present or play on your stereo are performing songs by songwriters represented by all three PROs. Second, if you’re an agent of said PRO, your motivation is to mislead the venue, because the higher their fees, the higher your salary. Third, if you’re a member of one of these PROs, the venues you play at are liable for paying fees to that PRO – yes, they owe fees for your performances of your own music – unless you issue a separate license to that venue, which you wouldn’t be doing unless the venue wasn’t paying any fees to the PROs – a license which, by the way, you have to forward to your PRO, which, if the venue was not paying PRO fees, might be interpreted as a hostile act.

Now, don’t get me wrong – people deserve to be reimbursed for the performance of the music they write. So says the copyright law in the US, which I’m actually kind of supportive of, at least I would be if the copyright maximalists would crawl back under the rock they oozed out from. But – ahem – people deserve to be reimbursed for the performance of the music they write, which is most emphatically not happening. Because the formula for distribution of live performance fees is based on airplay rather than actual song lists, Taylor Swift is being reimbursed for the performance of the music I write. Which is, unsurprisingly, not cool. Unless you’re Taylor Swift.

So imagine, today, being a small coffeehouse. Like, say, Somethin’s Brewin in Lakeville, MA, one of my favorite venues – at least until it stopped presenting live music. Imagine having long, rude, unpleasant discussions with PRO agents who insist that it’s up to you to prove to them that their music isn’t being presented at your venue. Imagine your fury when you discover that Sam Bayer, a local fave, doesn’t even receive the fees you’re paying for his performance. Imagine being complete, utterly, irretrievably disgusted.

Ironically, it seems, BMI was founded as a less odious alternative to ASCAP, and, again ironically, pioneered fees based on a sampling of actual live performances. Today, they’re no better than the rest of them. My contract doesn’t let me quit BMI except during a window that occurs every two years (and yes, I’m told by a reliable lawyer that it’s enforceable); I don’t get reimbursed for my live performances; I can’t waive my performance fees except by tattling on the venue; and I can’t even vote to change BMI, because, although its board is elected by its members, the votes are allocated according to  – you guessed it – airplay.

So if I want to play at Somethin’s Brewin, I’m hosed until I can quit, next September. It’s not that the club is doing anything illegal – like I said, they’ve stopped doing live music – it’s just that they’re not interested in the hassle of trying to convince BMI that they’re not doing anything illegal. So we’ve lost another venue, and BMI and ASCAP and SESAC don’t collect any fees at all from that venue – and nothing is, in case they haven’t noticed, less than some sort of negotiated fee rate – and their agents don’t get any money, and the songwriters they represent don’t get any exposure there, and I’ve lost a stage that I really like – it’s just a win-win situation all around.

There’s no reason for me to belong to a PRO. None. There’s no reason for just about any of us to belong to a PRO. For the vast majority of original singer/songwriters, gig income and album and download sales will be the only dollars they ever see from their music; even if you get a bit of airplay, you’ll never see a dime from it. Had I actually thought about this, and understood my music career clearly, it would have been obvious to me – but no, I had to succumb to the lure of lucre.

Especially without a waiver for my own performances, my contract with BMI is just a boat anchor. I’m simply fodder for them – a number they can point to when they call the tiny coffeehouses to shake them down. There’s only one word for the PROs nowadays: thugs. And I’m ashamed to have them represent me.